2008-10-08
Proposition 2 - Standards For Confining Farm Animals
BACKGROUNDProponents say Prop 2:
In recent years, there has been a growing public awareness about farm animal production methods, and how these practices affect the treatment of the animals. In particular, concerns have been expressed about some animal farming practices, including the housing of certain animals in confined spaces, such as cages or other restrictive enclosures.
PROPOSAL
Beginning January 1, 2015, this measure prohibits with certain exceptions the confinement on a farm of pregnant pigs, calves raised for veal, and egg-laying hens in a manner that does not allow them to turn around freely, lie down, stand up, and fully extend their limbs. Under the measure, any person who violates this law would be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and/or imprisonment in county jail for up to six months.
FISCAL EFFECTS
[T]his measure would require more space and/or alternate methods for housing pregnant pigs, calves raised for veal, and egg-laying hens. As a result, this measure would increase production costs for some of these farmers. To the extent that these higher production costs cause some farmers to exit the business, or otherwise reduce overall production and profitability, there could be reduced state and local tax revenues. The magnitude of this fiscal effect is unknown, but potentially in the range of several million dollars annually.
Additionally, this measure could result in unknown, but probably minor, local and state costs for enforcement and prosecution of individuals charged with the new animal confinement offense. These costs would be partially offset by revenue from the collection of misdemeanor fines.
- Prevents cruelty to animals.
- Improves our health and food safety.
- Supports family farmers.
- Means better conditions for neighbors and communities near factory farms.
- Protects our air and water resources and safeguards the environment.
- Is better for mitigating and reversing the effects of climate change.
Ever heard of free range chicken? This proposed piece of legislation is just that. Apparently, not enough people are buying products that are marked free range, which is probably why they are people pushing for this particular legislation. I'm going to assume that there aren't much buyers of free range products because it's more expensive. And since there aren't enough buyers, not enough farmers thought it wise to switch to free range practices. Simple supply and demand at work.
So if the market doesn't demand a particular product/support a particular agenda, what does one do? Make it the only legal alternative I suppose. Damn you animal rights fascists!
MY VOTE:
No on Proposition 2.
0 comments: to “ Proposition 2 - Standards For Confining Farm Animals ”
Post a Comment